![]() I’d love to hear from you! If you have any comments, concerns, or questions, please email me at You can also reach me on Twitter or if you have news tips, you can email us at U.S. Musk and Twitter reached a deal for $44 billion, or $54.20 per share for the platform, on April 25. ![]() You should construe this preservation notice as an instruction to take all reasonable steps to prevent the destruction or alteration, whether intentionally or negligently, of all documents, communications, and other information, including electronic information and metadata, that is or may be potentially responsive to this congressional inquiry.” “Furthermore, this letter serves as a formal request to preserve all records and materials relating to Mr. “We are concerned that OMI – where you were previously employed as Legal Director – may be trying to leverage its close relationship with you to take action to further limit free speech online,” Jordan said in the letter to FTC Chair Lina Khan. Musk said Twitter was comparable to a 2022 version of a Town Square and is needed because it is an “ inclusive arena for free speech.” Jordan believes that Musk may bring some Republican politicians who have been banned from the platform back by reactivating their accounts. When asked on Monday, Jordan declined to say explicitly that he would not cooperate with the committee but emphasized that The letter speaks for itself. Jordan has been vocally supportive of Musk’s purchase of Twitter, especially as the Tesla CEO’s main reasoning for acquiring the platform was to fight censorship through open-sourcing the network’s algorithm. Musk filed his disclosure three weeks after he passed the 5 percent threshold, which is a violation of the agency’s timeframe. Musk’s purchase of Twitter shares may have also violated SEC deadlines of when shareholders are required to disclose they own more than 5 percent of a public company. A report from The Information showed the FTC was concerned about whether Musk was “initially buying as someone who wanted to influence Twitter management or whether he saw himself as more of a passive shareholder.” And what do they have in common Democrats in charge. Just after the Twitter deal was announced, reports stated the FTC was looking into whether Musk obliged with an antitrust reporting requirement as he began to stock up on shares of Twitter in late January. Homicides in Austin, Texas, Portland, Oregon, and Atlanta, Georgia all hit historic highs this year. ![]() “We are concerned that OMI – where you were previously employed as Legal Director – may be trying to leverage its close relationship with you to take action to further limit free speech online,” Jordan said in the letter to the FTC. Can hardly get more Republican than complaining the things that got cut because Republicans were going to block them got cut. Musk has proposed ‘softening stance on content moderation,’ which will increase speech, and he has said that ‘Twitter should be more cautious when deciding to take down tweets or permanently ban users’ accounts.’ OMI’s desire to restrict and suppress free speech online helps explain why it supports a package of ill-advised Democrat-led antitrust bills that will lead to more censorship, and thus less speech, in the digital arena,” Jordan said. Musk’s purchase is a ‘threat to free communications and debate in the United States.’ In reality, Mr. The editorial also mentions the website PJ Media and its writer Megan Fox, who claimed that the case “should now be placed in the hoax category” after she appeared on Mr Watters’ programme.“OMI claims without evidence that Mr. The Wall Street Journal‘s editorial board – in an editorial titled “An Abortion Story Too Good to Confirm” – claimed that “there’s no evidence the girl exists” and determined that the case is an “unlikely story from a biased source that neatly fits the progressive narrative but can’t be confirmed.” He also told USA Today that the case is “more likely” a “fabrication”. Ohio’s Republican attorney general Dave Yost – who filed the motion to dissolve the injunction that blocked the state’s anti-abortion law minutes after the Supreme Court ruling – claimed on the programme that there was not the “slightest hint that this had occurred there”. ![]() Fox News host Jesse Watters also elevated those doubts in primetime segments on 11 July. On his Fox News programme on 12 July, Tucker Carlson claimed that the case was “not true”. Right-wing media personalities and outlets rushed to discredit the report and attacked the legitimacy of Dr Bernard. They could care less about the environment or the planet. MAGAs only think in terms of what benefits THEM and the mega-wealthy minority. Sign up now for a 30-day free trial Sign up As an Ohioan, I profusely apologize for the embarrassment that is Jim Jordan. Access unlimited streaming of movies and TV shows with Amazon Prime Video
0 Comments
Leave a Reply. |
AuthorWrite something about yourself. No need to be fancy, just an overview. ArchivesCategories |